UK Supreme Court Ruling on Uber
Similar to Rajasthan''s legislation, Karnataka''s draft bill adopts a welfare board model. However, this model does not address fundamental employment relations, crucial for ensuring minimum wages, occupational safety, health standards, and collective bargaining rights.
The bill identifies aggregators as ''aggregators'' rather than employers, sidestepping crucial legal obligations associated with traditional employment relationships. This approach undermines the application of protective labor laws, leaving issues such as minimum wage and working hours unaddressed.
Despite provisions for welfare schemes, the draft bill fails to integrate institutional social security benefits like provident fund and maternity benefits, standard for regular employees. Historical failures in implementing similar welfare board models, like the Construction Workers Welfare Act of 1996, raise concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed legislation.
The Karnataka Platform-based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2024, represents a step towards acknowledging gig workers'' rights. However, without addressing employment relations and ensuring comprehensive legal protections, it risks perpetuating the vulnerability of gig workers. Recommendations include redefining employment relations within the gig economy framework and integrating core labor rights into future legislative efforts.
The discussion surrounding Karnataka''s draft bill underscores the need for nuanced policy frameworks that balance innovation and worker protections in the evolving gig economy. Future legislative efforts must prioritize clarity on employment relationships and robust enforcement mechanisms to safeguard the rights and well-being of gig workers effectively.