Regulatory reform stuck in a loop in Health Ministry
Introduction
Policy Initiatives: The DCGI, under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, announced reforms on three critical issues impacting public health: drug recall guidelines, good distribution practices, and the regulation of similar brand names.
Objective: These measures are intended to safeguard public health by ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs, preventing errors in prescription, and improving distribution standards.
Policy Initiatives and Their Importance
Drug Recall Guidelines:
Purpose: To swiftly remove drugs failing quality tests from the market to prevent potential harm to patients.
Significance: Ensures that unsafe or substandard drugs do not reach consumers, thereby protecting public health.
Good Distribution Practices (GDP):
Purpose: To regulate the storage and distribution of drugs during transit and sale.
Significance: Ensures that drugs are stored and handled properly, maintaining their efficacy and safety until they reach the consumer.
Regulation of Similar Brand Names:
Purpose: To avoid confusion caused by similar drug names, which can lead to prescription errors and harm to patients.
Significance: Reduces the risk of medication errors by ensuring that drug names are distinct and not misleading.
Historical Context and Persistent Issues
59th Report of the PSC (2012):
Focus: Evaluated the functioning of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) and identified issues with drug recall guidelines, drug storage standards, and confusing brand names.
Historical Flagging:
Drug Recall Guidelines: Initially flagged by the Drugs Consultative Committee (DCC) in 1976.
Storage Standards: Identified by the Supreme Court in 1974.
Brand Name Confusion: Raised by the Court in 2001.
Implementation Challenges
Non-Binding Nature of Guidelines:
Current Status: Recent drug recall guidelines (2012, 2017, 2024) announced by the DCGI lack legal enforceability.
Issue: The DCGI cannot create binding laws; only the Ministry of Health can, resulting in ineffective enforcement.
Storage Guidelines:
Proposal History: Proposal to adopt WHO’s GDP guidelines and make them binding was discussed in 2013.
Challenges: Resistance from stakeholders and anticipated pushback from trade associations due to cost implications of implementing the guidelines.
Recent Developments: Despite acknowledging the problem, the government has yet to finalize and enforce binding GDP guidelines.
Brand Name Regulation:
Existing Rule: Companies are required to self-declare that their brand names are not similar to existing ones.
Shortcomings: The rule is inadequate as it relies on self-regulation and does not address the issue of misleading or confusing names effectively.
Repeated Delays and Bureaucratic Stagnation
Drug Recall Guidelines:
Cycle: Guidelines have been proposed multiple times but lack enforceability due to their non-binding nature.
Good Distribution Practices:
Delay Reasons: The proposal to make GDP guidelines legally binding faces delays due to logistical concerns and opposition from trade associations.
Brand Name Regulation:
Ineffective Measures: Government responses have included administrative actions rather than substantial reforms, resulting in continued issues with confusing drug names.
Root Causes of Ineffectiveness
Leadership and Expertise Issues:
Role of Joint Secretary: The Joint Secretary heading the Drug Regulation Section often lacks domain expertise and institutional knowledge.
Impact: Frequent changes in leadership and lack of expertise contribute to ineffective policy formulation and implementation.
Bureaucratic Resistance:
Stakeholder Pushback: Pharmaceutical and trade associations resist reforms that require additional investments or operational changes.
Bureaucratic Tactics: The use of repeated consultations and discussions serves to delay action and avoid making binding decisions.
Recommendations for Reform
Strengthening Legal Framework:
Drug Recall Guidelines: Should be made legally binding with clear enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance.
Good Distribution Practices: GDP guidelines need to be mandated as law to ensure proper storage and handling of drugs.
Brand Name Regulation: Introduce rigorous vetting by the regulator to prevent misleading or confusing drug names.
Enhanced Regulatory Oversight:
Regulatory Empowerment: DCGI and other regulatory bodies should have the authority and resources to enforce compliance and prevent violations.
Direct Intervention:
Prime Minister’s Office: To break the cycle of inaction, higher-level intervention from the Prime Minister’s Office may be necessary to ensure adherence to reforms and overcome bureaucratic resistance.